powertechexposed.com home



Uranium mining controversy hits Washington Post, CNN, Baltimore Sun, and international websites

Associated Press story looks at impact on Hedigers' organic wheat farm; Powertech CEO Clements repeats misleading description of ISL as a "closed-system"

Posted February 23, 2008, Updated February 26, 2008



A story written by Associated Press business reporter Sandy Shore and released on February 23 has traveled around the globe and exposed a worldwide audience to Powertech's controversial Centennial Project.  The article focuses on the town of Nunn and never mentions the fact the proposed mining area is less than 12 miles from downtown Fort Collins, a growing city of 130,000 people.


The reporter interviewed Jean Hediger, who with her husband Randy runs an organic wheat farm on the east side of the proposed mining area.  Hediger asks the compelling question: "How do you farm organically next to a uranium mine?"


Powertech CEO Richard Clement repeats his claim that in situ leach uranium mining is "safe".  Clement has recently hired several attorneys to fight Colorado House Bill 1161, which would amend the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act to require that uranium mining companies restore groundwater aquifers to premining conditions or state human health standards.  HB-1161 was just approved in an 11-2 vote by the Agriculture, Livestock and Natural Resources Committee and has been referred to the House Appropriations Committee.


Clement describes in situ leaching as a "closed-system mining process."  The plain language interpretation of Clement's statement is that the mining fluids, including dissolved uranium and other heavy metals, are contained within an impermeable physical structure that prevents leakage into the surrounding groundwater aquifer.  Not so.  What Clement actually means is that in situ mining relies on water pressure to control the mining fluids.  The theory is that injection and extraction well pumping rates are adjusted so that negative water pressure draws the mining solution toward the extraction wells. 


Most of the time, this is how ISL works.  The problem is that errors happen and mining fluids flow away from the mining zone.  Monitoring wells, which are typically located 300-500 feet outside of the mining zone, are intended to detect these "excursions".  Upon detection, pumping rates are adjusted in an attempt to reverse the escaping mining fluids.  Sometimes, excursions can be corrected in a few days or weeks.  More serious excursions can take months or years to reverse.  When a monitoring well is on "excursion status" for several months, contaminated groundwater may be escaping the mining zone and moving into adjacent areas of the aquifer.  Apparently, this is Clement's idea of a "closed-system mining process."  







Colorado Residents Fight Uranium Mine



The Associated Press

Saturday, February 23, 2008; 5:26 AM


NUNN, Colo. -- Jean Hediger can stand at the edge of her organic wheat farm and look west to the Rockies, east toward this speck-in-the-road town and straight ahead into what she sees as her worst nightmare.

A Canadian company's plans to establish a uranium mine just across the two-lane county road from Hediger's farm has triggered a bitter tug-of-war with residents of this fast-growing region about 70 miles north of Denver who fear the risk of contaminated water and other health problems.

Jean Hediger in her warehouse - Nunn, Colorado"How do you farm organically next to a uranium mine?" Hediger asks. "It's pretty darned scary, isn't it?"

Powertech Uranium Corp. Chief Executive Officer Richard Clement insists the firm's closed-system mining process, in which a solution of oxygen and sodium bicarbonate is injected to recover the uranium, is safe.

"There's a lot of misinformation out there about nuclear, about uranium, about radiation, about the effects of mining," he said. "This is probably one of the most benign methods of mining that you're ever going to encounter."

Similar confrontations are occurring in the West, Nebraska and even Virginia as uranium companies try to meet a voracious global demand for new nuclear power plants and capitalize on rising prices _ hovering around $90 per pound to $100 per pound, from a low of about $7 just five years ago.

Uranium flourished in the 1950s, '60s and '70s for use in atomic weapons and then nuclear reactors. It was a heady time in the West as miners using Geiger counters staked out claims in areas with large uranium reserves such as Uravan, Colo.; Ticaboo, Utah; Grants, N.M. and the Navajo Nation's lands in Arizona, New Mexico and Utah.

The bottom fell out of the industry when the Cold War ended and uranium from weapons stockpiles flooded the marketplace. Its price plummeted from $40 a pound in the late 1970s to less than $10 a pound in the 1980s, according to the Colorado Geological Survey.

The Three Mile Island reactor accident in 1979 and the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine soured the public on the use of nuclear power.

Today, as more nations look to nuclear power as an alternative to coal and oil, the world's uranium supplies are dwindling. In the past two years, thousands of mining claims have been staked on federal lands in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming.

"Everything started picking up like crazy in '04 in those states," said Roger Haskins, a Bureau of Land Management specialist in mining law.

Public awareness has risen again, too, as seen in the battle in northern Colorado.

Powertech, which is based in Vancouver, British Columbia, proposes a $20 million uranium mine west of Nunn. It's working to obtain operating permits and hopes to open the mine in 2009. Powertech has purchased uranium mineral rights on 5,760 acres in Weld County for its operation.

Across most of the West, residents who buy property own the surface rights _ but most do not own the rights to minerals under their land, which can be sold or leased separately from public agencies and private firms and individuals.

Powertech plans to use a process where the oxygen-and-baking soda solution will capture the uranium and carry it to the surface. The system is designed to keep water from escaping into the air. "You know how a water softener works? Well, it's exactly the same thing. It's a big water softener," Clement said.

The uranium will be taken to another facility to be transformed into yellowcake, a refined uranium oxide used in the production of uranium fuel.

The mining process, called in-situ recovery, will be located away from potable water supplies, Clement said. One such mine has operated without incident in South Texas since 1974.

Nunn, Colorado, is typical of rural America; just about everybody knows everybody else in this town of about 520 whose streets are carved from dirt. County roads ramble through wide open spaces of short-grass prairie that is home to burrowing owls, raptors and eagles.

A former stop on the Denver Pacific railroad, Nunn has survived over the years on agriculture. Its center is a grain elevator, a cafe, a post office and a handful of businesses. A giant water tower boasts the phrase, "Watch Nunn Grow."

Five years ago, folks would gather at the grain elevator to chat about crop and cattle prices and catch up on the news. Since then, Greeley, Fort Collins and metropolitan Denver have reached into the fringes of the area, transforming it into a bedroom community.

Farmers sold huge ranches to create 85-acre ranchette lots for residents who wanted a rural lifestyle for raising their children, allowing them to participate in such time-honored clubs such as 4-H.

Among the immigrants are Jay and Robin Davis, who moved into Nunn in February 2006, settling on an 80-acre parcel. Davis researched oil, coal, natural gas and even diamonds to see whether any company could buy the mineral rights beneath his land.

Finding few of those resources, he and Robin moved in and established a haven for children where they could learn about nature and sustainable living. They put up a clubhouse and offered riding lessons for neighborhood kids.

They never once thought about uranium.

When they received a letter from Powertech informing them of the planned mine, the Davises thought it was a joke. "Our mineral rights are actually owned by Powertech," Robin Davis said.

Hediger and her husband, Randy, bought their farm from Randy's father in 1988 and are the largest landowners around Nunn. They raise organic wheat and millet with the help of their 19-year-old son, Bryce, and hope to one day pass the land along to him.

They didn't give uranium a thought either until they received the Powertech notice. "My family is threatened, just like my neighbor," Hediger said.

Hediger and the Davises have joined hundreds of residents from Fort Collins to Greeley, packing town hall gatherings and city and county meetings to voice their opposition.

A group called Coloradoans Against Resource Destruction has gathered 7,514 signatures on petitions seeking to stop the operation and posted small signs in the area that warn of the potential mine by using a familiar symbol for radiation.

The opponents and the company also have taken their battle to the Internet. Powertech's Web site is called NunnGrow.com, which takes visitors to the company's home page where they can find details about the plan.

Opponents operate NunnGlow.com, which includes newspaper stories and editorials about the mine, updates on government action and risk studies on potential contamination.

Colorado lawmakers are considering legislation to place restrictions on uranium mining and require mining companies to prove they will restore groundwater aquifers to pre-mining quality before they receive permits for in-situ operations.

The bill also would require companies to show that technology exists to clean up any pollution that results from mining.

Powertech, which has properties in Wyoming and South Dakota, has begun exploratory drilling on the site across from Hediger's farm to gather data for its application for an operating permit. It also will do air, weather, groundwater and engineering tests to submit to Colorado regulators.

Clement said the company will continue to communicate with residents in the area.



Colorado Residents Fight Uranium Mine - Sandy Shore

Washington Post - February 23, 2008


Colorado town wages war on uranium mine plans - AP

Cable News Network - February 24, 2008


Farmers fret over uranium - AP

Baltimore Sun - February 23, 2008


(Click here for AP story with 8 photos)


New uranium boom hits home as small Colorado town wages war on mine plans - AP

International Herald Tribune - February 26, 2008


Colorado Residents Fight Uranium Mine - AP

London Stock Exchange - February 23, 2008


Colorado Residents Fight Uranium Mine - AP

www.finanznachrichten.de - February 23, 2008


Residents in Small Colo. Town Mobilize Against Planned Uranium Mine; Pollution Concerns - Sandy Shore

Canadian Business - February 23, 2008